ToolsComparisons

The 10 Best AI Visibility Tools in 2026, Honestly Ranked

A use-case ranking of the AI visibility market in 2026: Profound, Peec, Otterly, Reach, ClarAI and five more, with real pricing, honest tradeoffs, and a disclosure most lists skip.

TThe ClarAI team
AI search visibility, ClarAI
AUGUST 5, 2026 · 8 MIN READ
A ranked shortlist of AI visibility tools laid out as a comparison table, with pricing and use-case columns.

If you just want the shortlist: Profound is the strongest enterprise pick, Peec AI is the fastest-moving choice for scaling marketing teams, Otterly is the cheapest way to start monitoring, Reach is the best done-for-you option if you would rather pay a specialist to execute, and ClarAI, the tool we build, is the pick if you want self-serve monitoring plus an execution layer at a monitoring-tool price. The rest of this post explains each pick, what these tools genuinely do well, and what they cost.

First, the disclosure most posts in this genre skip: this is written by the ClarAI team, and ClarAI appears in the ranking. Nearly every "best AI visibility tools" list you will find online is published by a vendor, and that vendor almost always ranks itself first. We are not going to pretend to be neutral. What we can do is rank by use case instead of by ourselves, credit competitors for the things they are genuinely better at, and keep every claim to something we can source. Pricing reflects each vendor's public information as of August 2026 and will drift. Updated 1 October 2026: Peec's and Reach's prices and ClarAI's own plan details were corrected to what their pricing pages (and ours) said in September 2026. Corrected 13 October 2026: this post said Profound's entry price was 99 dollars a month and that Otterly has a free plan, and it repeated four Profound claims we could not source on 13 October 2026 (a Partnerize partnership, coverage in 30 plus languages, five-figure contracts and a 400 million conversation explorer). Profound's pricing page now shows a free trial and a custom-priced Enterprise plan, Otterly's shows a free trial rather than a free plan, and the four unsourced claims are gone. The dataset sentence now gives both of Profound's own figures, with their sources. Updated 13 October 2026: Reach's service entry now matches its pricing page as read that day: two retainers (Core Engine at 8,000 dollars and Hardcore Mode at 15,000 dollars a month) and 250 dollars per placement; the page no longer names a minimum customer size or a dedicated specialist, which this entry used to repeat.

How we ranked

Four questions drove the ranking. What does the tool actually measure, and across how many engines? Does it disclose how it measures, including sample sizes, or does it hand you a single confident number? Does it help you act on what it finds, or only watch? And is the pricing something a buyer can reason about before a sales call? A background fact shapes all four: large language model answers are nondeterministic, so any tool in this category is sampling a moving target. Tools that acknowledge that in their product earn extra credit here.

1. Best for enterprise: Profound

Profound is the category's enterprise leader, and the gap is real. Its signature asset is Prompt Volumes, demand data that Profound's Prompt Volumes page puts at 1.5 billion plus real AI conversations; its September 2026 funding announcement says more than 2 billion real user prompts. It ships Agent Analytics for AI crawler and referral tracking, an agents and workflows action layer, shopping analysis, and the SOC 2 and HIPAA checkboxes procurement will ask about. Its pricing page, read on 13 October 2026, shows a free seven-day trial (50 prompts a day) and a custom-priced Enterprise plan that adds more answer engines, up to nine, with no dollar price shown; its FAQ also mentions a self-serve Agency Growth plan, again without a price. The 99 dollar entry price this post first quoted is no longer listed, and that opacity is the honest tradeoff: if you have the budget and a procurement team, Profound is the benchmark. If you do not, there is no published paid tier to start on.

2. Best for fast-scaling teams: Peec AI

Peec is the category's growth story: reportedly zero to 10 million dollars in annual recurring revenue in 16 months, with 2,500 plus customers including Squarespace, Hugo Boss, and TUI. The product is polished multi-model citation monitoring with share-of-voice dashboards, region-level reporting, coverage in 115 languages, AI Shopping Analytics since June 2026, and concrete action suggestions such as which subreddits to engage and which content gaps to fill. Its pricing page listed Starter at 70 euros a month billed annually, Pro at 180 euros and Advanced at 360 euros in September 2026, with Enterprise on request. The tradeoff: Peec suggests actions, it does not execute them for you, so plan for the hours to act on what it surfaces.

3. Best budget monitoring: Otterly

Otterly is the cheapest serious way to find out whether AI engines mention you, starting at 29 dollars a month, with a free trial for new users rather than a free plan. It pairs monitoring with a useful Prompt Research tool. It is monitoring-first by design: you get visibility into where you stand, and the fixing is on you. For a solo founder or a small brand that mainly needs an answer to "do the engines know we exist," that is exactly the right amount of product for the price.

4. Best done-for-you service: Reach

Reach (usereach.ai) sells two things, and both are worth knowing about. Since September 2026 it has a self-serve platform again (Starter at 100 dollars a month for ChatGPT only, Growth at 400 dollars, Scale at 1,500 dollars). The other is the service this entry ranks: a done-for-you AI search service run by Reach's own experts. On 13 October 2026 its pricing page listed two monthly retainers, Core Engine at 8,000 dollars and Hardcore Mode at 15,000 dollars, each with a three-month minimum and then month to month with 30 days' notice, plus add-ons such as 250 dollars per link or mention placement. The scope covers new and revamped pages, link and mention placements, community engagement and AI prompt tracking. Their published case claims include 506 thousand dollars in signed contract value influenced for ColdIQ, 7.6x organic traffic in 4 months, and a 1,318 percent year-over-year increase in AI-search revenue for Indie Campers. Those are their numbers, not ours to verify, but the model is clear: if you have zero internal bandwidth and the budget of a funded SaaS, paying for execution works.

5. Best self-serve monitoring plus execution: ClarAI

ClarAI is our tool, so here is exactly what it ships and nothing more. It monitors three engines: ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. Google AI Overviews is built but not switched on yet. It stores the raw answers and citations behind every score so you can audit the number you are shown, and it discloses coverage: when a score comes from 4 of 72 prompts measured, the interface says so. On top of monitoring sits an action layer: a prioritized action plan whose tasks execute into draft deliverables, a content engine that produces eleven deliverable types (with a monthly fair-use cap on drafts), a community inbox for Reddit and other channels, and site plus tech audits that tie each finding to the AI prompts it affects. Pricing is public: every account starts with a 7-day trial with no card (Pro's monthly limits once you confirm your email), then a free Watch plan with one brand project, the headline score and its trend; Pro is 99 dollars a month with unlimited brand projects, and Agency is 299 dollars a month for client workspaces, an org rollup and white-label reports. The honest tradeoffs: ClarAI is newer than everything above it on this list, it has no billion-conversation demand dataset like Profound, and its language coverage is narrower than Peec's. Corrected 7 October 2026: this paragraph said ClarAI monitored Google AI Overviews alongside ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. On that date production read ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude only; AI Overviews was built but not yet switched on. Every correction we make is listed at myclarai.com/corrections.

Five more worth knowing

  • Scrunch: from 250 dollars a month, acquired by Sitecore in June 2026 and now folding into a digital experience platform roadmap. The natural pick if you are already a Sitecore shop, weaker as a standalone bet.
  • Evertune: launched Shopping Intelligence in January 2026, focused on product-level AI visibility rather than brand-level monitoring.
  • Promptwatch: tracks ChatGPT Shopping carousels specifically. Narrow, but if product cards are your battleground it is the specialist.
  • Geoptie: leads with a free audit, no credit card, which makes it a low-friction way to get a first read on your brand.
  • Spotlight: also leads with free audits and sits in the same low-friction entry lane.

We have less first-hand research on the last three than on the top five, and their pricing was not benchmarked in our latest market pass, so treat those entries as pointers rather than reviews. That is also the honest thing to say out loud rather than pad with adjectives.

How to choose

  • Ask for sample sizes. If a tool shows you a visibility score, ask how many prompts, how many runs, and how many engines produced it.
  • Ask to see the raw evidence. Real answers and real citations should be one click from any number.
  • Decide whether you need watching or fixing. Monitoring-only tools are cheaper for a reason: the work still lands on your desk.
  • Check how the price scales with brands. Agency and multi-brand teams get punished by per-project pricing faster than they expect.
  • Be suspicious of any tool implying inside access to how ranking works. Google has stated publicly that no third-party tool has access to its internal ranking or AI systems.

See where you stand before you pick a tool

Grade your site for free: an AI readiness grade with the exact fixes, plus one real AI answer as a sample. No credit card. The full picture, with answers and citations for your prompts, comes with the seven-day trial.

Sources

Google Search Central, Optimizing your website for generative AI features on Google Search (on third-party access to ranking)developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/ai-optimization-guideProfound, pricing page (read 13 October 2026)www.tryprofound.com/pricingProfound, Prompt Volumes page (read 13 October 2026)www.tryprofound.com/features/prompt-volumesProfound, Series D announcement, 15 September 2026www.tryprofound.com/newsroom/profound-raises-usd180m-series-d-at-usd1-8b-valuation-to-build-the-ai-platform-for-marketing-teamsOtterly, pricing page (read 13 October 2026)otterly.ai/pricing
T
The ClarAI team

We build ClarAI, a platform for measuring and improving how brands appear in AI answers across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. When we appear in our own comparisons, we say so.