Your buyers ask AI which tool to pick. See the answer, then fix it.
When someone asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or Google AI Overviews for the best tool in your category, are you the one it names, or is it a competitor? ClarAI reads the answers ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude give, keeps them behind every score, then drafts the fixes: comparison content, community replies, and the technical changes. Your team reviews and approves. Google AI Overviews is built but not switched on yet.
Example label: 4 of 72 prompts measuredEvery score shows its sample size. Every answer is stored, word for word.
The buyer's first question moved
Many buyers now ask ChatGPT as well as Google. Ahrefs, Semrush, and Moz track Google. The question is who tracks the rest, and whether the answer names you or the vendor next to you.
"Are we in ChatGPT?" is a fair question from your boss, and today most teams answer it by opening ChatGPT once and hoping. ClarAI answers it with evidence: the real answers three engines give to your buyers' questions, who gets recommended instead, and a drafted fix for every gap.
Because the score keeps its sample size and the raw text, the number survives contact with a skeptical stakeholder. You are not defending a vibe, you are showing the sentence.
An illustration of the dashboard, not live data
The prompt
"What is the best tool for [your category]?"
- Engines tracked
- ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude
- Named in the answer
- The competitors each engine recommends
- Your brand
- Present or absent, with the sample size
Real accounts render this from your own prompt set across the three engines. This card shows the shape, not a specific result.
The scoreboard
See what AI actually says, with the receipts
Not a single reading from one chat window. A tracked scoreboard across three engines, with the evidence kept behind every number.
Three engines, one dashboard
The real answers ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude give to the questions your buyers actually ask, tracked prompt by prompt.
The raw answers, stored
Every score keeps the full answer text and the citations behind it. When you claim you are being left out, you can show the exact sentence that leaves you out.
Who gets named instead
ClarAI pulls the competitors each engine recommends in your place, so 'who wins this prompt' is a name on the screen, not a guess.
Sample size on every number
Each score carries how many prompts were measured, and measured prompts are kept separate from unmeasured ones. A number you can defend in the QBR.
The part nobody else ships
Then ClarAI drafts the fix
Every monitoring tool tells you where you stand. ClarAI closes the loop: for each prompt you are losing, it drafts the work your team reviews, approves, and ships.
Comparison content
The content engine drafts the comparison pages, listicle entries, and category answers for the prompts you are losing, styled to your brand. You edit and publish.
Community replies
The community CRM finds the threads where buyers ask, then drafts a reply. Every draft goes through your approval flow before a human on your team posts it.
Technical changes
The site and tech audits check AI crawler access, snippet eligibility, and structured data, then cross-reference the findings to the prompts they affect. Fix the page, win the prompt.
A draft is not an autopilot. Nothing goes out under your brand's name until a named human on your team approves it. That is the point.
The honest instrument
The category's loudest criticism is false precision. We built the opposite.
- Every score carries the number of prompts it measured. A 100% on 3 prompts reads as exactly that.
- Measured prompts are kept separate from unmeasured ones, so a thin sample never masquerades as a full scan.
- The raw answer text and citations are stored behind every number, ready to show a stakeholder.
- We never claim access to any engine's internal ranking or AI systems. Nobody honest can.
ClarAI is new and pre-launch, so you will not find customer logos or testimonials here. What you will find is a product you can test against your own domain today.
SaaS FAQ
Which AI engines does ClarAI actually check?
ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. Google AI Overviews is built but not switched on yet. ClarAI runs the engine calls for you, so you do not wire up any API keys. Claude answers carry citations from its web search; ChatGPT and Gemini are tracked for brand mentions and position, and their sources count too when they answer with a web search, where enabled.
Do you really draft the fixes, or just tell me what to do?
Both, in that order. First the scoreboard shows where you stand with the receipts. Then ClarAI drafts the work: comparison content and other deliverables from an 11-type content engine, community reply drafts routed through your approval flow, and the technical changes the site audit surfaces. Your team reviews and approves. Nothing publishes itself.
Can I trust the numbers?
Every score carries its sample size, measured prompts are kept separate from unmeasured ones, and the raw answer text plus citations sit behind every number. ClarAI never claims access to any engine's internal ranking or AI systems. If you cannot reproduce a number, tell us and we will show our work.
Do you have SaaS customers I can talk to?
Honestly, not yet. ClarAI is new and pre-launch, so there are no customer names or testimonials on this page. Every account is seeded with demo brand projects you can explore, and the free grader runs on your own domain right now, no signup.
What does it cost to start?
The grader is free with no signup. The free tier includes 1 brand project plus the seeded demo projects, so you can walk the full workflow without paying. Pro is $99 per month. No metered credits, no surprise overage bills.
Running AEO for clients instead of one brand? See ClarAI for agencies.
Find out where you stand in AI answers
Grade your site free to see the technical readiness in under a minute, or create an account and run the full analysis across three engines with the seeded demo brands to explore.