Search Console will not answer it. Opening ChatGPT once and taking a screenshot is not a sample, and the first thing a sceptical stakeholder asks is how you know. ClarAI measures what the AI engines actually say about your brand, keeps the sample size and the raw answers behind every score, and then drafts the work for the prompts you are losing.
Every score shows the sample it came from. The grader needs no signup and no card. The free tier includes 1 brand project, so you can run a real analysis on your own brand before you decide anything.
Somebody senior read an article, or saw a competitor recommended inside an AI answer, and now organic owns a question the reporting stack was never built to answer. Meanwhile you are still measured on the old scorecard, so the honest answer has to arrive with evidence attached or it does not survive the meeting.
ClarAI is built for that meeting. It is the same monitor-to-fix loop the rest of the product runs, opened all the way up: the per-prompt resolution, the per-market split, and the working out behind every figure you are about to say out loud.
It does not tell you which questions were asked, or which brands were named beside you, and it says nothing about the engines outside Google.
One answer on one day is not evidence, and AI answers change between runs. The first follow-up question will be how many times you asked.
Either five figures a year with a prompt minimum, or a monitor that reports the problem and leaves the work to you.
Four things travel together, so the follow-up question has an answer before it is asked.
How often the engines named your brand across the prompts that were measured, with the count printed on the number rather than buried in a methodology page.
Pulled out of the answers themselves, so who is winning a prompt is a name on the screen instead of an inference.
Full answer text stored word for word with its citations. When you say an engine leaves you out, you can show the line that leaves you out.
A brand selling in more than one country reads each market on its own, and the sampling guarantees each tracked market is measured rather than averaged away.
A monitor tells you that you are losing. It does not give you back the quarter. ClarAI drafts the work for the prompts you are losing, and a named person on your team reviews and approves it.
For the prompts you are losing, the content engine drafts the comparison pages, category answers and listicle entries, grounded in your own brand and the gaps the run found. Your team edits and publishes.
Where competitors are cited and you are not, kept as a pipeline from prospect to published, plus a community inbox that drafts replies and routes them through approval before anyone posts.
A sitemap-driven audit of crawler access, snippet controls, structured data and agent readiness, cross-referenced to the exact prompts each page could help you win. Fix the page, win the prompt.
A draft is not an autopilot. Nothing goes out under your brand's name until someone on your team approves it. That is deliberate, and it is what makes the output safe to put your name on.
The honest limit, said here rather than left for you to discover: a run samples a budgeted set of your highest-priority prompts rather than every prompt on every engine, because AI answers are nondeterministic and a full census would cost more than it is worth. The sample size is on the screen, and the per-engine floor and total call budget are configurable if you need a wider one. We never claim access to any engine's internal ranking or AI systems, because nobody honest can.
Everything below is shipped and usable now, on the same account you can start free today.
Prompt-level results across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, plus Google AI Overviews when you opt in, with a per-market selector so a multi-country brand reads each market on its own instead of one blended average.
The domains, pages and YouTube videos cited in the answers, grouped and ranked, so you can see who is being quoted for the prompts you want. Citations come back from the grounded engines, Perplexity and Claude.
Drafts the fix as the deliverable your team reviews, from landing pages and comparison content to community replies, all grounded in your own brand and the prompts you are losing.
The on-site half, tied to AI search rather than to generic SEO: crawler access, snippet controls, structured data and agent readiness, each finding mapped to the prompts it affects.
The off-site half as a pipeline: where competitors are cited and you are not, tracked from prospect to published, plus a community inbox with drafted replies routed through approval.
A programmatic API with scoped keys, plus an MCP server so you can query your visibility data straight from Claude Desktop, Cursor or any MCP client. Both are on Pro.
All of this sits in the Advanced view, which is a control at the top of the sidebar rather than a plan you buy. Someone on your team who is not an SEO can work the same account in Simple view, on the same data, at no extra cost.
Then the job is different: a workspace per client kept fully separate, a rollup across all of them, approval routing per client, and a report that carries your name rather than ours. That is the Agency tier, and it has its own page.
If the add-on you already own answers the question well enough, keep it. It is on an invoice you have already cleared, and we are not going to pretend a feature list beats that. The two things it does not do are the reason people move: it does not draft the fix for the prompts you are losing, and it does not show you the sample size and the raw answer behind the number it gives you. If you have to defend the figure to somebody, that second one decides it.
Be straight about this in the review: a run samples a budgeted set of your highest-priority prompts across the engines rather than asking every prompt every time, because AI answers are nondeterministic and a full census would cost more than it is worth. What matters is that the number of prompts measured is printed on the score and the coverage badge says how much of your set the run covered. If you need a wider sample, the per-engine floor and the total call budget are both configurable. A smaller disclosed sample is defensible. An undisclosed one is not, whoever is quoting it.
No, and they are complementary rather than competing. Google's report gives you impressions on Google's own AI surfaces. It does not tell you which questions were asked, which brands were named beside you, or anything at all about ChatGPT, Perplexity or Claude. ClarAI samples the questions your buyers ask across the engines and keeps the answers, which is the half Search Console cannot give you.
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, plus Google AI Overviews when you turn it on. ClarAI runs the engine calls for you, so you do not wire up any API keys. On a project with more than one target market, a selector lets you read each market on its own, and the analysis samples per market rather than blending everything into a single figure.
No. Simple, Standard and Advanced are three free views of the same product, switched from a control at the top of the sidebar, and switching changes no data. Existing accounts already open in Advanced. The paid tiers sell capacity: Free is $0 with 1 brand project, Pro is $99 a month for unlimited brand projects, and Agency is $299 a month for running a book of clients.
Chart PNG export is on Pro, so a chart can go straight into the deck with its sample size attached. A full PDF report carrying your own name is on the Agency tier. Everything else you can screenshot with the coverage badge and the raw answer visible, which is the point of putting them on the screen.
Honestly, not yet. ClarAI is in early access and there are no customer names or testimonials on this page. What you can do today is run the free grader on your own domain with no signup, then create a free account and run a real analysis on your own brand.
Selling a B2B SaaS product specifically? There is a page for that.
Grade your site free with no signup to see whether the engines can read it at all, or create a free account and run a real analysis on your own brand.